Thursday, July 22, 2010

The Inheritance of Loss: A Review


     I started reading this one afternoon when I sat in the bookstore. I hadn't purchased a copy by that time. And much to my surprise I sat there and read about 100 pages. I did not budge an inch. So, one might ask- Is this a good book? Unfortunately I do not know how to answer that question. I did think it was very well written, however, was very surprised to learn that it won the Booker prize for 2006.
     The Inheritance of Loss, Kiran Desai's second book, travels back and forth between Kalimpong, a tiny Himalayan hill town, and the streets of New York City, with a few scenes rolling in England.
     The story revovles around a 16 year old orphaned girl Sai, who is sent to live with her grandfather a retired judge and former civil servant, who lives in a desolate bungalow on the hills in Kalimpong. The judge has a cook, whose son Biju is an illegal immigrant in New York, who tries to make a living by doing all kinds of odd jobs. The plot oscillates between the lives of Sai, the judge and his cook with the backdrop of the Gorkhaland agitation, and Biju's struggles to build a life for himself in the States. The book is full of other Kalimpong characters most of whom are uproots living in exile. All the characters  in the book seem to be struggling for something-some yearn for love while some struggle for acceptance. There is a prominent potrayal of  immigrant emotions in most of the characters as they try to discover who they are and where they belong to. Desai's narrative of exotic locations and eccentric characters is colorful and heart warming.
      So, why was I surprised that this book won the Booker. At times I found the narrative incoherent, as it shifted between the characters in Kalimpong and the desperation portrayed by the character in New York. Some conversations were complex and the dialogue was copious at times. A times the sentences confused me. I am not sure if it is an accepted form of prose or experimentation, where the author used odd punctuation and expressions in the middle of some sentences. Am I suggesting that the book was badly written, definitely not. Please give it a try. You might love it or it could just pass for an average book. However, it did not fulfill my expectations of a Booker winner.

7 comments:

  1. I agree with incoherence and the fact that it won a Booker is equally surprising to me :(((... and I thought I was the only one..

    ReplyDelete
  2. Phew! Thank goodness..I am not the only one with that conclusion :)
    Sree, read anything interesting lately?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sometimes it baffles me that the most confusing of things get an awrd hence the tag "Award Movies"

    ReplyDelete
  4. For me, it was a struggle to read that book. I didn't like the book at all. I didn't and couldn't appreciate neither the subject (nothing new or dramatic) nor the narration.

    ReplyDelete
  5. @siree...: I can totally understand what you mean. I had some difficulty too at places, but tried to read it as quickly as I could, just to see if I could at any point in the book discover it's Booker-worthiness :)

    ReplyDelete
  6. That is a very well written review. Not sure I want to pick this given my seasonal interest in reading! But I know where to check first before my next read.-V

    ReplyDelete
  7. :) Thanks, Mr V!..Lazy to log-in huh? :)

    ReplyDelete

Thoughts shared